![]() The Bad – Basic functionality and no online community for support. The Good – Free, straightforward text-to-speech software with the option to add voices from other sources The Bad – Considerably more expensive than other neural TTS offeringsīest for quick-and-dirty TTS that works out of the box The Good – Create and edit neural TTS audio and video together in an online editor The Bad – No support for neural TTS, and the available voices are already widely used by YouTube creatorsīest for those just beginning to experiment with video lessons The Good – Straightforward, no frills text-to-speech software with flexible pricing The Bad – More expensive than either Google or Amazon (neural TTS is twice the price)īest for creators with a large amount of text to process looking for a cheaper option than Amazon, Google, or Azure The Good – Azure also offers greater voice customizability than either Google or Amazon The Bad – Slightly more expensive than Amazon Pollyīest for creators who want to create audio content with a one-of-a-kind voice The Good – Reportedly offers better user support than Amazon Polly, along with more voices and languages The Bad – Aggregated reviews suggest Google Text-to-Speech offers better user supportīest for creators who are ready to pay for TTS and value user support The Good – Full-featured, with standard and neural TTS support at the best price point compared to competitors The best text to speech tools money can buyĪ summary of the best text to speech tools we reviewed: Text To Speech Toolīest for creators who are ready to pay for TTS with neural capabilities To date, the only way to get free neural TTS services is to sign up for a trial for a paid service. Even if it’s more expensive than standard TTS, neural TTS can create some truly lifelike-and listenable-audio. In essence, a computer program is fed thousands of hours of human speech, accompanied by text, and learns how to imitate a human reading something aloud. Neural TTS draws on neural network technology, or AI, to generate more natural-sounding speech. ![]() Plus, a lot of the software available today lets you make adjustments to standard output, so you can change the length of pauses, the speed of speech, and how words are pronounced. But standard TTS has the benefit of being cheaper than neural TTS. When you think of artificial, stiff sounding TTS, you’re thinking of this. Neural TTSīefore diving into the world of text to speech, it’s important to know the difference between standard and neural TTS tools. In fact, once you’ve got a TTS tool set up the way you want it, your only major time investment is writing the material. In all these instances, TTS saves you the time it would take to record an audio track in person. Accessibility for the visually impaired – text to speech is a great way to accommodate those who can hear better than they can see.Repurposing blog content by turning articles into a narration that you can use in voiceovers, and videos.Video adds flavor to your course, giving your students a break from course materials and quizzes.Audiobook versions of self-published eBooks open up a new revenue stream-people who would never read a 300-page book about your subject might be willing to buy something they could listen to on the drive to work.Audio versions of course texts make it easier to access course material for students who are visually impaired or struggle with reading comprehension. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |